Legal Opinion

Ingram v. Hines, Dir. Gen.

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided December 18, 1923No. 11379PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

Mr. Justice Cothran.

Action for $740.95 damages, on account of the loss of three mules shipped over the Seaboard Air Dine Railway, from Atlanta, Ga., to Pageland, S. C., on January 22, 1920. Upon trial the plaintiff had a verdict for the full amount claimed, but upon motion of defendant the Circuit Judge ordered a new trial, and from this order the plaintiff has appealed.

The evidence tends to establish the following facts:

The plaintiff purchased in Atlanta 19 mules and 2 horses oh January 22, 1920, which he prepared to ship to Page-land, S. C., in…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Daughty v. Northwestern RailroadSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1912
  2. Lampley v. Atlantic Coast Line R. R.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1907
  3. Marshall v. Charleston & Savannah Ry. Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1900
  4. C. L. Pace & Co. v. Atlantic Coast Line R. R.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1909

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Sellars v. CollinsSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1948
  2. Snipes v. Davis, Director GeneralSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1925
  3. Donkle v. ForsterSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1961
  4. Walker v. QuinnSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1926
  5. Harvey v. Southern Ry. Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1925

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API