Legal Opinion

Gream v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided November 5, 2002No. ED 80437PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CLIFFORD H. AHRENS, Judge.

Johnny Gream (“movant”) appeals the judgment of the motion court denying his motion for post-conviction relief pursuant to Rule 24.035 on the merits without an evidentiary hearing. In his motion, mov-ant claims that he was denied effective assistance of counsel in that his attorney advised him not to speak with representatives of the Division of Probation and Parole until the issues involving his prior convictions were resolved, which prevented him from being considered for the 120-day drug treatment program or for long-term drug treatment following his guilty plea.…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Wilson v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 1991
  3. State v. TaylorSupreme Court of Missouri · 1996
  4. Hagan v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 1992
  5. Morrow v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 2000

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Morales v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2003
  2. Hartman v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2004
  3. Wright v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2013
  4. White v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2002
  5. Robin Lucas v. State of MissouriMissouri Court of Appeals · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API