Legal Opinion

Wright v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided October 22, 2013No. ED 99364PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CLIFFORD H. AHRENS, Judge.

Stanley Wright (“Movant”) appeals from the judgment of the motion court denying his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief without an evidentiary hearing. Finding no error, we affirm.

On October 7, 2009, Movant pleaded guilty to felonious restraint in violation of section 565.120 RSMo 2000 pursuant to a plea agreement with the State. The State dismissed a second charge, armed criminal action, and recommended that Movant receive a term of five years’ imprisonment with a suspended execution of sentence and five years of supervised probation. Thereafter, Movant…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Wilson v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 1991
  3. State v. TaylorSupreme Court of Missouri · 1996
  4. State v. DriverSupreme Court of Missouri · 1995
  5. Roberts v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 2009

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Floyd Snow, Jr. v. State of MissouriMissouri Court of Appeals · 2015
  2. Depriest v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2016
  3. Amber R. Miller v. State of MissouriMissouri Court of Appeals · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API