Legal Opinion
Myers v. Cigna Property & Casualty Insurance
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided February 7, 1997No. 96 Civ. 0902 (RPP)PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
ROBERT P. PATTERSON, Jr., District Judge.
Defendant Cigna Property and Casualty Insurance Company (“Cigna”) moves, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure (“Fed. R.Civ.P.”) 56(c) for summary judgment dismissing the claims of Plaintiffs Martin Myers and Sand & Seas, Inc. (collectively “Myers”) to recover under a policy of marine insurance for damage sustained to Myers’ 53-foot Hatteras yacht.
BACKGROUND
The subject of this litigation is Myers’ 1976, 53-foot Hatteras motor yacht named “DAD’S TOT’. (Defendant’s Statement of Undisputed Material Fact Pursuant to Local Civil Rule…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Carol A. Gallo v. Prudential Residential Services, Limited Partnership, Doing Business as Prudential Relocation ManagementCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1994
- Wilburn Boat Co. v. Fireman's Fund InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1955
- Security Mutual Insurance v. Acker-Fitzsimons Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1972
- Ingersoll Milling Machine Co. v. M/V BodenaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1987
- Steen v. . Niagara Fire Insurance CompanyNew York Court of Appeals · 1882
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Houston v. Teamsters Local 210District Court, E.D. New York · 2014
- Fabozzi v. Lexington InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2010
- Montefiore Medical Center v. American Protection InsuranceDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2002
- Abner, Herrman & Brock, Inc. v. Great Northern InsuranceDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2004
- Rockland Exposition, Inc. v. Great American Assurance Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 2010
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.