Legal Opinion

Hale v. Brown

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided April 9, 1958No. 6212PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

UDALL, Chief Justice.

The trial court .found, after considering the voluminous record before it — which included the pleadings, depositions, transcripts of two hearings before the Industrial Commission (108 pages), the transcript (45 pages) of a so-called coroner’s inquest held some nine months after death, and several affidavits — that there were no genuine issues as to any material fact to be tried, and hence it held both defendants were entitled to judgment as a matter of law. This appeal followed

A chronological factual statement of the uncontroverted facts is necessary to a proper…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Cole v. Associated Construction Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1954
  2. Stevens v. AndersonArizona Supreme Court · 1953
  3. Hale's Estate v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1954
  4. Suburban Pump & Water Co. v. LinvilleArizona Supreme Court · 1943
  5. PHOENIX FEED AND SEED CO. v. AdamsArizona Supreme Court · 1955

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Tovrea Land and Cattle Company v. LinsenmeyerArizona Supreme Court · 1966
  2. Mozes v. DaruCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1966
  3. Estate of Hernandez v. FlavioArizona Supreme Court · 1997
  4. McElhanon v. HingCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1985
  5. SWC Baseline & Crismon Investors, L.L.C. v. Augusta Ranch Ltd. PartnershipCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2011

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API