PHOENIX FEED AND SEED CO. v. Adams
Arizona Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
UDALL, Justice.
The primary question presented on this appeal is whether the trial court properly granted a summary judgment in favor of appellee Olga I. Adams, who will be hereinafter referred to as defendant Adams.
The law is well settled that a summary judgment should never be entered unless the facts are clear and undisputed. If there is a controversy on a factual question, judgment should be withheld until' proof has been made. Sligh v. Watson, 69 Ariz. 373, 384, 214 P.2d 123, 130. Rule 56 (c), Rules Civ.Proc. (now appearing as Section 21-1212, A.C.A.1939), provides in part:
“ * * * The…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Sligh v. WatsonArizona Supreme Court · 1950
3Cited by4 opinions
- Peterson v. Valley National Bank of PhoenixArizona Supreme Court · 1962
- Hale v. BrownArizona Supreme Court · 1958
- Colby v. Bank of DouglasArizona Supreme Court · 1962
- Hale v. BrownArizona Supreme Court · 1958