Legal Opinion

PHOENIX FEED AND SEED CO. v. Adams

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided February 1, 1955No. 5899PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

UDALL, Justice.

The primary question presented on this appeal is whether the trial court properly granted a summary judgment in favor of appellee Olga I. Adams, who will be hereinafter referred to as defendant Adams.

The law is well settled that a summary judgment should never be entered unless the facts are clear and undisputed. If there is a controversy on a factual question, judgment should be withheld until' proof has been made. Sligh v. Watson, 69 Ariz. 373, 384, 214 P.2d 123, 130. Rule 56 (c), Rules Civ.Proc. (now appearing as Section 21-1212, A.C.A.1939), provides in part:

“ * * * The…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Sligh v. WatsonArizona Supreme Court · 1950

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Peterson v. Valley National Bank of PhoenixArizona Supreme Court · 1962
  2. Hale v. BrownArizona Supreme Court · 1958
  3. Colby v. Bank of DouglasArizona Supreme Court · 1962
  4. Hale v. BrownArizona Supreme Court · 1958

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API