Suburban Pump & Water Co. v. Linville
Arizona Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtMcALISTER, C. J.
The plaintiff, Ruth A. Vincent, brought an action against the Suburban Pump and Water Co., a corporation, hereinafter referred to as the company, and from a judgment in favor of W. H. Linville, whom the company had brought into the case as a third party defendant, the company appeals.
The facts giving rise to the action may be stated as follows: On May 20, 1926, W. H. Linville and one Win Wylie executed the following agreement:
“This Agreement made and entered into, this 20th day of May 1926, by and between W. H. LINVILLE, party of the first part, and WIN WYLIE, party of the second part,
“Witness…
2Cited by7 opinions
- Valencia Energy Co. v. Arizona Department of RevenueArizona Supreme Court · 1998
- Hale v. BrownArizona Supreme Court · 1958
- Colby v. Bank of DouglasArizona Supreme Court · 1962
- Luther Construction Co. v. Arizona Department of RevenueCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2003
- MSR Resort Golf Course LLC v. Waldorf=Astoria Management LLC (In re MSR Resort Golf Course LLC)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 2012
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.