Brigham Young University v. Paulsen Construction Co.
Utah Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
ZIMMERMAN, Justice:
This is an appeal from a judgment on the pleadings entered in favor of Paulsen Construction Company (“Paulsen”) and Chris-tiansen Brothers & Associates, Inc. (“Chris-tiansen”), against Brigham Young University (“BYU”). The district court held that BYU’s claims against the two construction contractors are barred because they were not brought within the three-year period of limitation imposed by section 78-12-26(1) of the Code. Before this Court, BYU contends that the six-year limitation period of section 78-12-23(2) should apply and that the statute did not begin to run on…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- North Carolina State Ports Authority v. Lloyd A. Fry Roofing Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1978
- Myers v. McDonaldUtah Supreme Court · 1981
- Lumbermen's Mutual Casualty Co. v. Pattillo Construction Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1985
- Becton Dickinson and Co. v. ReeseUtah Supreme Court · 1983
- Bracklein v. Realty Ins. Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1938
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by39 opinions
- Russell Packard Development, Inc. v. CarsonUtah Supreme Court · 2005
- Ward v. Intermountain Farmers Ass'nUtah Supreme Court · 1995
- Bauman v. DayAlaska Supreme Court · 1995
- Berenda v. LangfordUtah Supreme Court · 1996
- Warren v. Provo City Corp.Utah Supreme Court · 1992
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.