Blanchard v. Kaiser Foundation Health Plan of the Northwest
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtLandau, J.
Plaintiff brought this action for a declaration that defendant is required by statute to cover treatment for his reconstructive jaw surgery. We reversed the trial court’s entry of summary judgment in favor of plaintiff. Blanchard v. Kaiser Foundation Health Plan, 117 Or App 377, 844 P2d 248 (1992), rev den 316 Or 142 (1993). On remand, the trial court entered judgment for defendant, and plaintiff appeals. We reverse.
Plaintiff suffers from a congenital condition called “partial anodontia,” which leaves him with only six upper teeth and four lower teeth. Because none of those teeth meet, they…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Portland General Electric Co. v. Bureau of Labor & IndustriesOregon Supreme Court · 1993
- State v. PrattOregon Supreme Court · 1993
- Windsor Insurance v. JuddOregon Supreme Court · 1995
- Star Rentals, Inc. v. Seeberg Construction Co.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1986
- Allen v. Pacific Hospital Ass'nCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1988
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Hayes Oyster Co. v. DulcichCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2005
- Roy v. PalmateerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2004
- Willamette Oaks, LLC v. City of EugeneCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2019
- Allen v. County of Jackson CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2003
- Liberty Northwest Insurance v. GordineerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1997
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.