Legal Opinion
Windsor Insurance v. Judd
Oregon Supreme Court
Decided July 27, 1995No. CC 92-7-183; CA A78403; SC S41775PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtVan Hoomissen, J.
In this declaratory judgment action, Michael and Donna Judd (defendants) appealed a summary judgment in favor of Windsor Insurance Company (Windsor), which declared that Windsor was not obligated to provide underinsurance coverage to them. The Court of Appeals affirmed. Windsor Ins. Co. v. Judd, 130 Or App 558, 882 P2d 1135 (1994). For the reasons that follow, we reverse and remand to the trial court with instructions to enter summary judgment in favor of defendants.
The facts are undisputed. Defendants’ son, Gordon Judd, was killed in a two-car collision while a passenger in a car driven by…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Portland General Electric Co. v. Bureau of Labor & IndustriesOregon Supreme Court · 1993
- Hoffman Construction Co. of Alaska v. Fred S. James & Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1992
- Hampton Tree Farms, Inc. v. JewettOregon Supreme Court · 1995
- Moore v. Mutual of Enumclaw InsuranceOregon Supreme Court · 1993
- To v. State Farm Mutual InsuranceOregon Supreme Court · 1994
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Vega v. Farmers InsuranceOregon Supreme Court · 1996
- Ken Leahy Construction, Inc. v. Cascade General, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1999
- Carrigan v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1996
- Wright v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1998
- Beiswenger v. Psychiatric Security Review BoardCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2004
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.