Town of Richmond v. Murdock
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtRobert W. Hansen, J.
As at a cornhusking bee, some shucking needs to be done in this case to get down to the major issues presented by this appeal. So we begin by discussing and discarding the general claim of constitutional infirmity in any town in this state providing for conditional use permits as to a commercial operation in an area zoned agricultural.
Free speech. Appellant contends that the prohibition without use permit of his skeet-shooting range operation is “an abridgement of the right of free speech and of assembly.” As to free speech, while more than verbal or written communication may be involved, we…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Zylka v. City of CrystalSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1969
- City of Milwaukee v. Milwaukee CountyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1965
- Schmidt v. Department of Local Affairs & DevelopmentWisconsin Supreme Court · 1968
- Scharping v. JohnsonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1966
- State ex rel. Cities Service Oil Co. v. Board of AppealsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1963
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Willow Creek Ranch, L.L.C. v. Town of ShelbyWisconsin Supreme Court · 2000
- Snyder v. Waukesha County Zoning Board of AdjustmentWisconsin Supreme Court · 1976
- Milas v. Labor Ass'n of Wisconsin, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1997
- Department of Revenue v. Moebius Printing Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1979
- Town of Rhine v. BizzellWisconsin Supreme Court · 2008
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.