Legal Opinion

Van Beek v. Ninkov

District Court, N.D. Iowa

Decided June 2, 2003No. C 03-4014-MWB, C 03-4017-MWBPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER REGARDING DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS, STAY OR TRANSFER

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER REGARDING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO REMAND AND DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS, STAY OR TRANSFER

BENNETT, Chief Judge.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

I. INTRODUCTION AND BACKGROUND .1039

II. LEGAL ANALYSIS.1040

A. The Iowa Case.1040

1. Standards And Procedures Of Removal Jurisdiction.1040

2. Complete Diversity.1041

B. The Federal Case .1043

1. The Local Action Rule .1043

2. Determination If Claims Here Are Local Or Transitory.1045

III. CONCLUSION.1046

I. INTRODUCTION AND BACKGROUND

On February 13, 2003,…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Colorado River Water Conservation District v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Stewart Organization, Inc. v. Ricoh Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
  3. Owen Equipment & Erection Co. v. KrogerSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  4. Strawbridge v. CurtissSupreme Court of the United States · 1806
  5. Carden v. Arkoma AssociatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1990

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Prawoto v. PrimeLendingDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2010
  2. Kingsborough v. Sprint Communications Co., LpDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2009
  3. Charlyn Greene v. Nationstar Mortgage, LLC, d/b/a Mr. Cooper, et al.District Court, D. North Dakota · 2026

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API