Legal Opinion
Kingsborough v. Sprint Communications Co., Lp
District Court, D. Massachusetts
Decided December 9, 2009No. Civil Action 07-10651-LTSPublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
REVISED MEMORANDUM AND ORDER ON JOINT MOTION FOR FINAL APPROVAL OF CLASS-ACTION SETTLEMENTS
SOROKIN, United States Magistrate Judge.
[Take note that this Revised Memorandum and Order replaces the Memorandum and Order issued by the Court on September 10, 2009.]
This putative nationwide class-action arises out of the installation of fiber-optic cable on railroad rights-of-way by three of the nation’s largest telecommunications companies. The plaintiffs are landowners in forty-six states who have asserted trespass, unjust enrichment, and related claims against the defendants for conduct that began…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- Amchem Products, Inc. v. WindsorSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Neirbo Co. v. Bethlehem Shipbuilding Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1939
- Durfee v. DukeSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Devlin v. ScardellettiSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
- Underwriters National Assurance Co. v. North Carolina Life & Accident & Health Insurance Guaranty Ass'nSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Dewey v. Volkswagen of AmericaDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2010
- Fager v. CenturyLink Communications, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2016
- Prawoto v. PrimeLendingDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2010
- Cascade Corp. v. Sprint Communications Co.District Court, D. Maine · 2012
- Medimpact Healthcare Systems, Inc. v. IQVIA Holdings Inc.District Court, S.D. California · 2019