Keller v. Elks Holding Co.
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
NORDBYE, District Judge.
This is an appeal by plaintiff from a judgment for the defendants notwithstanding the jury’s verdict for the plaintiff in a negligence action brought to recover damages for personal injuries. The trial court ruled that plaintiff was, as a matter of law, contributorily negligent. On appeal, this Court views the evidence and the reasonable inferences therefrom in the light' most- favorable, to ithe .verdict — here, in the -light most favorable to. the plaintiff. . ' ■ -
This action is occasioned by injuries received by the plaintiff, James A. Keller, on November 16,…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- F. W. Woolworth Co. v. DavisCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1930
- Huus v. RingoNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1949
- Bagg v. Otter Tail Power Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1941
- De Honey v. HardingCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1924
- Johnson v. MauNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1931
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Schultz & Lindsay Construction Co. v. EricksonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1965
- Cupita v. Carmel Country Club, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1960
- Schultz & Lindsay Construction Company v. EricksonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1965