Legal Opinion

Keller v. Elks Holding Co.

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided January 25, 1954No. 14805PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

NORDBYE, District Judge.

This is an appeal by plaintiff from a judgment for the defendants notwithstanding the jury’s verdict for the plaintiff in a negligence action brought to recover damages for personal injuries. The trial court ruled that plaintiff was, as a matter of law, contributorily negligent. On appeal, this Court views the evidence and the reasonable inferences therefrom in the light' most- favorable, to ithe .verdict — here, in the -light most favorable to. the plaintiff. . ' ■ -

This action is occasioned by injuries received by the plaintiff, James A. Keller, on November 16,…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. F. W. Woolworth Co. v. DavisCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1930
  2. Huus v. RingoNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1949
  3. Bagg v. Otter Tail Power Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1941
  4. De Honey v. HardingCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1924
  5. Johnson v. MauNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1931

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Schultz & Lindsay Construction Co. v. EricksonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1965
  2. Cupita v. Carmel Country Club, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1960
  3. Schultz & Lindsay Construction Company v. EricksonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1965

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API