Legal Opinion

In Re Thomas and City of Petaluma

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 28, 1917No. Civ. No. 2048PublishedCited by 3 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtRichards, J.

This is a proceeding instituted in the superior court of Sonoma County to determine the difference and controversy between the parties named therein in respect to the validity of certain proceedings for the doing of street work in and by the city of Petaluma, whereby the property of the appellants herein was sought to be charged with their proportion of the expense incident to such work. The sole question presented upon this appeal involves the legality of the procedure adopted and pursued by the said municipal corporation in doing the street work in question.

The city proceeded under the…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. City of Petaluma v. HughesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1918
  2. Drake v. QuinnCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1941
  3. Coffey v. WayCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API