Legal Opinion
Johns v. Rozet
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided July 23, 1993No. Civ. A. 91-130PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
CHARLES R. RICHEY, District Judge.
Before the Court in the above-captioned case are the Plaintiffs’ Motion for Summary Judgment against Garnishee Merrill, Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith and the Defendants’ Renewed Motion for a Stay pending appeal. The Court held a hearing on these motions on May 25, 1993. For reasons more fully explained below, the Court shall grant the Plaintiffs’ Motion for Summary Judgment and shall deny the Defendants’ Motion for a Stay.
On March 20, 1992, the jury returned a verdict in favor of the Plaintiffs in this case and judgment was entered for an agreed upon…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Ascher v. GutierrezDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1975
- Imperial Commodities Corp. v. AuxiliadoraDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1987
- Larry Santos Productions v. Joss Organization, Inc.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 1988
- Secure Engineering Services, Ltd. v. International Technology Corp.District Court, E.D. Virginia · 1989
3Cited by5 opinions
- ESTATE OF JONES BY BLUME v. KvammeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1995
- United States v. YorkDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1995
- Ribbens International, S.A. v. Transport International Pool, Inc.District Court, C.D. California · 1999
- Clark v. WilburDistrict Court, S.D. West Virginia · 1996
- Gaughan v. First Community BankDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2014