Legal Opinion
Clark v. Wilbur
District Court, S.D. West Virginia
Decided January 11, 1996No. Civil A. No. 2:92-0935PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
HADEN, Chief Judge.
Pending is Plaintiffs motion to compel Defendants to deliver certain assets in partial satisfaction of judgment.1 For the reasons set forth below, the Court GRANTS Plaintiffs motion.
I. INTRODUCTION
On July 7, 1995 the Court entered judgment against Defendants Dudley D. Allen and John H. Wilbur in the amount of $6,198,-591.34 and against Defendant Frank E. Clark, Jr. in the amount of $2,107,521.34. On September 6, 1995 the Court granted Plaintiffs motion to register the judgment in the Middle District of Florida and in any other district where…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Riggs v. Johnson CountySupreme Court of the United States · 1868
- Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co. v. SturmSupreme Court of the United States · 1899
- In the Matter of Marie ERICKSON, Debtor-Appellee. Appeal of DORCHESTER STATE BANKCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1987
- Thomas v. PeacockCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1994
- Citizens Bank of Maryland v. Strumpf.Supreme Court of the United States · 1995
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Mitchell v. LYONS PROFESSIONAL SERVICES, INC.District Court, E.D. New York · 2010
- Travelers Indemnity Co. of Illinois v. Hash Management, Inc.District Court, M.D. North Carolina · 1997
- Nicol Nagel, individually and ESY Investments, LLC, a California limited liability company v. Tracy A. WestenCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2015