Legal Opinion

Rowland v. Maddock

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided May 22, 1903PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLoring, J.

This is a bill in equity by two creditors of one Tebbitt, an absconding debtor, against the defendants, who, as a committee of Tebbitt’s creditors, had undertaken to recover from him his property and distribute it among such creditors as assigned their claims to them.

The defendants demurred to the bill of complaint, the demurrer was overruled and an appeal taken. An answer was then filed, the case went to a master, seven exceptions were taken by the defendants, and an interlocutory decree was made sustaining four of the seven. From this the plaintiffs took an appeal, the suit went back to the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Barney Ex Rel. Woodhull v. SaundersSupreme Court of the United States · 1854
  2. Cook v. . LowryNew York Court of Appeals · 1884
  3. Blake v. PegramMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1872
  4. Brooks v. JacksonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1878
  5. Newton Rubber Works v. de las CasasMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1903

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Fuller v. Trustees of Deerfield AcademyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1925
  2. Warren v. PazoltMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1909
  3. Shulkin v. ShulkinMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1938
  4. Ashley v. WinkleyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1911
  5. McMahon v. KrapfMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1948

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API