Legal Opinion
Anderson v. State
Missouri Court of Appeals
Decided January 26, 1988No. 53264PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
REINHARD, Judge.
Movant appeals after the denial of his Rule 27.26 motion without an evidentiary hearing. We affirm.
On March 26, 1981, movant pled guilty 1 to charges of first degree assault and exhibiting a dangerous and deadly weapon. He was sentenced to a term of 25 years’ imprisonment. In January 1987, movant filed a Rule 27.26 motion which was amended following appointment of counsel. Mov-ant alleged, among other matters, that his trial counsel was ineffective because she did not investigate his claim of intoxication after “[she] was informed by movant that he was intoxicated at the time…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Hill v. LockhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- North Carolina v. AlfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Sanders v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 1987
- Richardson v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1986
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Thomas v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1988
- Smith v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1990
- Johnson v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1989
- Morris v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1988
- McLaurin v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1988
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.