Legal Opinion

State v. Singleton

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided March 30, 2000No. CR 99-1172PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LAVENSKI R. SMITH, Justice.

The State appeals the trial court’s acceptance of a guilty plea by Appellee Antonio Covell Singleton entered over the State’s objection. The State objected to entrance of the guilty plea, citing Ark. R. Crim. P. 31.1. The State contends that the trial court could not accept Singleton’s guilty plea because the State did not consent. The State asserts that Rule 31.1 requires the State’s consent before a defendant can waive a jury trial. The State reads the rule consistent with our recent cases and we must, therefore, reverse.

Facts

On March 9, 1999, the State charged…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Singer v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  2. Fretwell v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1986
  3. Walt Bennett Ford, Inc. v. Pulaski County Special School DistrictSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1981
  4. McGehee v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1999
  5. Bailey v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1998

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Buckley v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2002
  2. Jefferson v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2008
  3. Thomas v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2007
  4. Echols v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2003
  5. Houghton v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2015

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API