Anderson v. Dunn
Supreme Court of Kansas
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Jackson, J.:
This is an appeal from an action to recover taxes paid under protest. The only question posed to us is whether a transcript of the testimony taken before the county commissioners sitting as the county board of equalization was admissible in evidence.
The only assignment of error is the overruling of the motion for new trial based upon the exclusion of the above evidence. But perhaps a short account of how the action arose will be helpful.
Plaintiff is the owner of a considerable block of good bluestem pasture and farm land in Morris county.…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- City of Kansas City v. Jones & Laughlin Steel Corp.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1961
- Brinkley v. HassigSupreme Court of Kansas · 1930
- Capland v. Board of Dental ExaminersSupreme Court of Kansas · 1939
- Marks v. FrantzSupreme Court of Kansas · 1958
- Union Pacific Railroad Co. v. SloanSupreme Court of Kansas · 1961
3Cited by5 opinions
- Northern Natural Gas Co. v. BenderSupreme Court of Kansas · 1971
- Lakeview Village, Inc. v. BOARD OF JOHNSON CTY. COMM'RSSupreme Court of Kansas · 1983
- Cities Service Oil Co. v. KronewitterSupreme Court of Kansas · 1967
- Panhandle Eastern Pipe Line Co. v. HerrenSupreme Court of Kansas · 1971
- Timmons, Administrator v. McGaugheySupreme Court of Kansas · 1964