Hensel v. United States
Court of Customs and Patent Appeals
Appeal from Board of United States General Appraisers, Abstract 24104 (T. D. 31020).
1Opinion of the CourtSmith, Judge
A consignment of seamless flexible copper tubing or hose imported at the port of New York was assessed for duty by the collector of customs at 30 per cent ad valorem under the provisions of paragraph 151 of the tariff act of August 5, 1909. The following is the part of the paragraph which is material to the case:
151. * * * Flexible metal tubing or hose, not specially provided for in this section, whether covered with wire or other material, or otherwise, including any appliances or attachments affixed thereto, thirty per centum ad valorem; * * *
The importers protested against the assessment…
2Cited by4 opinions
- Loewenthal v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1915
- Knauth v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1913
- J. E. Bernard & Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1970
- Sekisui Products, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1969