Legal Opinion
Giduck v. Niblett
Colorado Court of Appeals
Decided July 3, 2014No. Court of Appeals No. 13CA0775PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
JUDGE GRAHAM
¶ 1 In this defamation case, plaintiffs, John Giduck, his wife Shari Nicoletti, and Archangel Group, Ltd., appeal the district court’s judgment in favor of defendants, Joe Niblett, Mitchell Isaac Lake, Jay Harrison, Philip D. Martin, Tracy-Paul Warrington, Patrick McAleer, and Karl Monger.1
¶ 2 We conclude the district court lacked personal jurisdiction over Niblett, Lake, Harrison, Warrington, McAleer, and Monger (the foreign defendants). We further conclude that 'plaintiffs failed to state a claim against Martin. We therefore affirm.
I. Background
¶ 3 Giduck and Nicoletti…
2Cases cited49 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Burger King Corp. v. RudzewiczSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Steel Co. v. Citizens for a Better EnvironmentSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- World-Wide Volkswagen Corp. v. WoodsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Hanson v. DencklaSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Ledroit Law v. KimColorado Court of Appeals · 2015
- Markus v. BrohlColorado Court of Appeals · 2014
- Dorsey & Whitney LLP v. RegScan, IncColorado Court of Appeals · 2018
- In Re State of Colorado, ex rel. Philip J. Weiser, Attorney General v. JUUL Labs, Inc. Adam Bowen James Monsees Nicholas Pritzker and Riaz ValaniSupreme Court of Colorado · 2022
- County Memorial Hospital v. ICAOColorado Court of Appeals · 2021
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.