Legal Opinion

Treires v. Folsom

District Court, D. New Jersey

Decided August 9, 1957No. Civ. 190-56Published

1Opinion of the Court

MADDEN, District Judge.

This action is, in effect, an appeal from an administrative ruling by the Social Security Administration brought under Section 205(g) of the Social Security Act, as amended, 42 U.S.C.A. § 405(g) to review a determination by that body that the widow, plaintiff here, Helen I. Treires, was not entitled to monthly benefits as the widow of Louis J. Treires, sometimes known as Louis J. Herman, and hereinafter referred to as the husband or wage earner, because the plaintiff was not “living with” him at the time of his death, as required by the Act.

A stipulation of facts has…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Universal Camera Corp. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
  2. Herbert L. Goldman, Administrator of the Estate of Esther B. Goldman v. Marion B. Folsom, Secretary of Health, Education and WelfareCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1957
  3. Caroline B. Ferenz v. Marion B. Folsom, Secretary of Health, Education and WelfareCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1956
  4. Roy M. Livingstone v. Marion B. Folsom, Secretary, Department of Health Education and WelfareCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1956
  5. Mary H. Rosewall v. Marion Folsom, Secretary of Health, Education and WelfareCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1957

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API