Legal Opinion

Roxana Petroleum Co. v. Covington State Bank

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided April 8, 1924No. 12578PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

LOGSDON, C.

This proceeding involves only the correctness of the action of the trial court in sustaining a general demurrer to the second amended petition of plaintiff and separately as to each of the four counts thereof. That only one cause of action was attempted to be stated is agreed by plaintiff and defendant. Plaintiff thus states the scope and purpose of its second amended petition at page 39 of its brief:

“Plaintiff in error incorporated in its second amended petition four separate counts or causes of action, each advancing a .distinct theory upon which it contends that a…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Wiley v. KeokukSupreme Court of Kansas · 1870
  2. Conwill v. EldridgeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918
  3. Butler v. KaulbackSupreme Court of Kansas · 1871
  4. Crowder State Bank v. Aetna Powder Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
  5. Mellon v. FultonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1908

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Farmers' State Bank of Belpre v. HarringtonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
  2. Southern Surety Co. v. Gilkey-Duff Hardware Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1933
  3. Oklahoma Natural Gas Corp. v. DouglasSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1934
  4. Gypsy Oil Co. v. ColbertSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1936
  5. Labor Investment Corporation v. RussellSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1965

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API