Legal Opinion

Crowder State Bank v. Aetna Powder Co.

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided December 23, 1913No. 3036PublishedCited by 33 opinions

Error from County Court„ Pittsburg County; B. P. Hammond, Judge. Action by the Aetna Powder Company against the Crowder State Bank and another to recover money judgment. Judgment for plaintiff against the bank only, and the bank brings error.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

ROBERTSON, C.

In the year 1907 W. A. Lovejoy, then engaged as a contractor by the .M., K. & T. Ry. Co., in Pittsburg county, Okla., being in need of powder and dynamite with which to prosecute his work, ordered a large quantity thereof from the Aetna Powder Company; the order was in writing, and at the bottom of the paper, and under the signature of Lovejoy, was the following:

“We agree to hold the amount of this bill out of funds due Mr. Lovejoy when same is received by us.
“The CROWDER State Bank,
“By J. L. HendersoN, Cashier.
“Aug. 2, ’07.”

And on the reverse side of the order appears…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Central Transportation Co. v. Pullman's Palace Car Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1891
  2. Railway Co. v. McCarthySupreme Court of the United States · 1878
  3. Salt Lake City v. HollisterSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
  4. Parish v. . WheelerNew York Court of Appeals · 1860
  5. State Board of Agriculture v. Citizens Street Railway Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1874

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by33 opinions

  1. Colcord v. GranzowSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1928
  2. First Nat. Bank of Ada v. WomackSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
  3. Gilbert v. Citizens' Nat. Bank of ChickashaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
  4. Oklahoma City Nat. Bank v. EzzardSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
  5. Bennett v. W. A. Gage & Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API