Legal Opinion
The Railroad Commission Of Texas v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided April 28, 1989No. 86-1681PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
874 F.2d 1338
The RAILROAD COMMISSION OF TEXAS, and J.B. Watkins, Petitioners,
v.
FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION, Respondent,
Northern Natural Gas Company, Division of Enron Corp.;
Phillips Petroleum Company; Cabot Pipeline Corporation;
Dorchester Master Limited Partnership; Texaco Producing
Inc.; Mobil Producing Texas & New Mexico Inc.; Natural Gas
Pipeline Company of America; the Energy Issues Intervention
Office of the Minnesota Department of Public Service;
Northern States Power Companies, Intervenors.
Nos. 86-1681, 86-1688.
United States Court of Appeals,
Tenth Circuit.
April 28, 1989.
Renea…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Motor Vehicle Mfrs. Assn. of United States, Inc. v. State Farm Mut. Automobile Ins. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Citizens to Preserve Overton Park, Inc. v. VolpeSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Securities & Exchange Commission v. Chenery Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Consolo v. Federal Maritime CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Bowman Transportation, Inc. v. Arkansas-Best Freight System, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1975
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- U.S. West Communications, Inc. v. HixDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 1997
- Mullet v. MillerCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1991
- Colorado Interstate Gas Co. v. Oklahoma, Ex Rel. Commissioners of the Land OfficeDistrict Court, W.D. Oklahoma · 1991
- Cellwave Telephone Services L.P. v. Federal Communications CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1994
- Cellwave Telephone Services L.P. v. Federal Communications Commission, Thomas Domencich, Committee for a Fair Lottery, Intervenors. Futurewave General Partners L.P. v. Federal Communications Commission, Thomas Domencich, Committee for a Fair Lottery, IntervenorsCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1994