Legal Opinion
Carrington v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided September 11, 2007No. 05-36143, 05-36144PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by Judge CALLAHAN; Concurrence by Judge NOONAN; Partial Concurrence and Partial Dissent by Judge PREGERSON.
ORDER
The opinion filed on December 13, 2006, is hereby withdrawn. A Superseding Opinion is filed simultaneously with this order.
OPINION
CALLAHAN, Circuit Judge:
In these sentencing cases Robert Tillitz and Craig Carrington (petitioners) assert a number of creative arguments in an attempt to have their final sentences reconsidered in light of the Supreme Court’s opinion in United States v. Booker, 543 U.S. 220, 125 S.Ct. 738, 160 L.Ed.2d 621 (2005). We conclude that petitioners have…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- United States v. BookerSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Blakely v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- United States v. Alfred Arnold AmelineCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
- Calderon v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- United States v. CantrellCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Robert Henry Moormann v Dora B. SchriroCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
- United States v. GamboaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
- United States v. Monique LozoyaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2021
- Carrington v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
- Carrington v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.