Hurt v. Oak Downs, Inc.
Court of Appeals of Texas
1DissentBond, Justice
Until the Legislature has enacted a statute prohibiting betting or wagering on dog races, I content myself with the laws as written, conceiving it to be the duty of the judiciary to decide on rights, regulated or controlled, according to the laws of the land, and not on belief of what ought to be the law. The judiciary should not legislate, but only determine the law as enacted by the legislative branch of the government, and not exalt its belief or notion above the law, and follow such as a higher Code.
The appellees in this case are shown to have valuable property rights, which they are not…
2Cases cited51 opinions
- Farmers' & Mechanics' National Bank v. HanksTexas Supreme Court · 1911
- Misch v. RussellIllinois Supreme Court · 1891
- McDade v. PeopleMichigan Supreme Court · 1874
- Ambler v. WhippleIllinois Supreme Court · 1891
- State v. SchuchmannSupreme Court of Missouri · 1896
46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.