Legal Opinion

Jones v. Chambers

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided September 25, 1956No. 36312PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtTownsend, J.

1. An exception to the general rule that a party may not impeach a witness voluntarily called by him where entrapment is not shown is that either party may make the opposite party a witness “with the privilege of subjecting such witness to a thorough and sifting examination, and with the further privilege of impeachment, as if the witness had testified in his own behalf and were being cross-examined.” Code § 38-1801. Where the witness is called to the stand “for cross-examination” it is to be understood that the opposite party is to be examined under this Code section, although a plaintiff…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. National Land & Coal Co. v. ZugarSupreme Court of Georgia · 1930
  2. Rainey v. MoonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1939
  3. Willett Seed Co. v. Kirkeby-Gundestrup Seed Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1916
  4. Milligan v. MilliganSupreme Court of Georgia · 1952
  5. Akridge v. Atlanta Journal Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1937

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. American Casualty Company v. SeckingerCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1963
  2. Colwell v. Voyager Casualty InsuranceSupreme Court of Georgia · 1983
  3. Thico Plan, Inc. v. AshkoutiCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1984
  4. Southeastern Metal Products, Inc. v. DeVaughnCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1959
  5. Southeastern Metal Products, Inc. v. DeVaughnCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1959

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API