Highfill v. Konnerman
Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976)
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion of the Court by
Drury, Commissioner'
Reversing.
In a suit begun by Edward H. Konnerman et al., devisees of Edward W. Konnerman, certain property was ordered sold for division, and at the sale thereof John Highfill became the purchaser. Highfill’s exceptions to the sale were overruled, and he has appealed.
It will not be necessary to consider but one of his exceptions, as it was fatal. It was this:
“Comes John Highfill,. the purchaser of the real ■property that was sold herein, and excepts to the Report of Sale and to the sale made herein by the Master Commissioner of this Court. . . .…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Morton's Gd'n v. MortonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1905
- Kean v. TilfordCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1884
- Gillespie v. Winston's TrusteeCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1916
- Latta v. Louisville Trust Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1923
- Moore v. Potter-Matlock Trust Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1915
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Kelly v. MarrCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1945
- Rodkey v. ReesCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1974
- Weddle v. WeddleCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1955