Legal Opinion

Grob v. Nelson

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided October 6, 1959PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBrown, J.

Removal of Defendants From Their Offices.

Sec. 17.13 (3), Stats., provides that any town officers may be removed “. . . by the judge of the circuit court of the circuit wherein the . . . town ... is situated, . . . for cause.” The procedure of removal is dictated by sec. 17.16 (3). This provides that such a removal for cause may be made only upon written verified charges preferred by a taxpayer and resident of the governmental unit of which the person against whom the charges are filed is an officer, and after a speedy public hearing.

The trial court correctly observed that the verification of…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Travelers Insurance v. Pierce Engine Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1909
  2. Blado v. KnollWisconsin Supreme Court · 1958

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. City of Appleton v. Town of MenashaWisconsin Supreme Court · 1988
  2. Department of Taxation v. O. H. Kindt Manufacturing Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1961
  3. McCroskey v. GustafsonColorado Court of Appeals · 1980
  4. Batt v. SweeneyCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2002
  5. Town of Muskego v. Town of VernonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1963

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API