Legal Opinion

Blado v. Knoll

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided May 6, 1958PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFaiechild, J.

Appellant contends that neither the county court of Monroe county nor the judge of that court has power to remove an officer of a school district. Respondent apparently concedes that the county court does not have the power, but contends that the judge does and that the order removing Knoll was the order of the judge.

Both parties agree that we must look first at sec. 17.13, Stats., providing:

“Officers of . . . school districts, however organized, may be removed as follows: . . .
“(3) Any . . . school district officer ... by the judge of the circuit court of the circuit wherein the . . . school…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. In re Incorporation of Village of North MilwaukeeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1896
  2. Opinion of the Justices to the SenateMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1938
  3. State Ex Rel. Wisconsin State Department of Agriculture v. AaronsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1946
  4. Tobin v. Willow River Power Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1932
  5. State v. MarcusWisconsin Supreme Court · 1951

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. State v. WashingtonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1978
  2. State Ex Rel. Jackson v. CoffeyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1963
  3. Grob v. NelsonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1959
  4. Town of Muskego v. Town of VernonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1963
  5. Town Board of Town of Taycheedah v. WebbCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1984

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API