Gransbury v. United Building Supply, Inc.
Alaska Supreme Court
1DissentBoochever, Justice
I dissent in this case because I believe that the judgment of the superior court in favor of United Building Supply, Inc. (United) should be affirmed. The case decided by the superior court was an equitable one to quiet title to certain real property. Both from the standpoint of legal rights and equitable rights, United should prevail.
On February 21, 1967, one week prior to Muller commencing his action against Withers, the original owner of the property, a conveyance from Withers to Briggs had been recorded placing Muller on notice that title had been conveyed to Briggs. Moreover, prior to…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- California Cigarette Concessions, Inc. v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1960
- Decker v. HendricksArizona Supreme Court · 1964
- Smith v. KrutarMontana Supreme Court · 1969
- Blumenstein v. Phillips Insurance Center, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 1971
- Western Motor Rebuilders, Inc. v. CarlsonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1959
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.