Legal Opinion
Paulo v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided November 12, 1996PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendant appeals, as limited by its brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Richmond County (Sangiorgio, J.), dated October 26, 1995, as denied its cross motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.
Ordered that the order is reversed insofar as appealed from, on the law, with costs, the cross motion is granted, and the complaint is dismissed.
This is an action to recover damages for personal injuries sustained when the plaintiff tripped and fell over a yellow speed bump located in the parking lot of one of the…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Tarricone v. StateAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
- Binensztok v. StoresAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
- Thornhill v. Toys "R" Us NYTEX, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
- Ackermann v. Town of FishkillAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
- Pilato v. DiamondAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
3Cited by15 opinions
- Gibbons v. LidoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
- Meyer v. TynerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
- Wint v. Fulton Street Art Gallery, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
- Blecher v. Holiday Health & Fitness Center of New York, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
- Stasiak v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.