Legal Opinion
Wint v. Fulton Street Art Gallery, Inc.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided July 26, 1999PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
—In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the plaintiff appeals, as limited by her brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Rappaport, J.), dated February 11, 1998, as (1) granted those branches of the motions of the defendant Fulton Street Art Gallery, Inc., and the third-party defendants Tong Chang Chaj and Sarah Chaj, and the motion of the defendants third-party plaintiffs Minister, Elders and Deacons of the Reformed Protestant Dutch Church of the City of New York and Collegiate Church Corp. which were for summary judgment dismissing the complaint…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Binensztok v. StoresAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
- Paulo v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
- Hopson v. Turf House, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
- Reuscher v. Pergament Home Centers, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
3Cited by12 opinions
- Pirie v. KrasinskiAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
- Pedersen v. Kar, Ltd.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
- Behar v. All Seasons Motor Lodge, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
- Patrie v. GortonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
- Fitzgerald v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.