Legal Opinion

State v. Hughey

New Mexico Court of Appeals

Decided June 27, 2005No. 24,732PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

FRY, Judge.

{1} The State appeals from an order excluding evidence of Defendant’s blood alcohol content (BAC) tested four hours after the accident caused by Defendant. In State v. Silago, 2005-NMCA-100, ¶¶ 12-15, 23, 138 N.M. 301, 119 P.3d 181, 2005 WL 1994285 [No. 24,854 (N.M. Ct.App. June 27, 2005) ], filed today, we held that a trial court erroneously excluded evidence of the defendant’s BAC based on a flawed reading of our case law on the relation back of BAC evidence, and we remanded that case so the trial court could consider whether to admit or exclude the evidence under proper…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Mata v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2001
  2. State v. AlbericoNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1993
  3. State v. AlbericoNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1993
  4. State v. TorresNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1999
  5. State v. BaldwinNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2001

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. State v. HugheyNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2007
  2. State v. DowneyNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2007
  3. State v. DayNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2006
  4. State v. SilagoNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2005
  5. State v. HugheyNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2005

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API