Legal Opinion

Parkesburg Borough v. Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided August 30, 1996PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KELTON, Senior Judge.

PROCEDURE

This case involves a dispute over responsibility for the State Street Bridge, located in the Borough of Parkesburg, Chester County. The bridge crosses over four electrified train tracks currently owned by the National Railroad Passenger Corporation (Amtrak). On June 13, 1996, we heard oral argument on the Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission’s (PUC’s) motion to quash the Borough’s November 9, 1995 petition for review of the PUC’s October 11, 1995 order. We also heard argument on the merits of that petition. We grant the PUC’s motion to quash.

BACKGROUND

This case…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. City of Philadelphia v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
  2. National Railroad Passenger Corporation v. The City of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1989
  3. Pennsylvania Industrial Energy Coalition v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
  4. National Railroad Passenger v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1987
  5. Popowsky v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1994

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Consumer Education & Protective Ass'n v. Public Utility CommissionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2004
  2. Galloway v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2002
  3. In re Appeal of PuricelliCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1998
  4. Township of Middletown v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1999

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API