Legal Opinion
Consumer Education & Protective Ass'n v. Public Utility Commission
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
Decided April 26, 2004PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION BY Judge LEADBETTER.
Petitioners (collectively CEPA)1 petition for review of the order of the Public Utility Commission (Commission) that approved as modified Philadelphia Gas Works’ (PGW) restructuring filing, which was filed pursuant to the Natural Gas Choice and Competition Act (Act), 66 Pa.C.S. §§ 2201-2212. On appeal, CEPA contends that the Commission erred: (1) in failing to specifically identify which provisions of PGW’s initial tariff failed to comply with Chapter 56 of Title 52 of the Pennsylvania Code (Chapter 56); (2) in concluding that PGW did not need to maintain pre-Act…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- In Re GrossSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
- Pap's A.M. v. City of ErieSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
- In re D.A.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
- Musheno v. Department of Public WelfareCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
- Popowsky v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Calpine Corp. v. PA DEP & PA EQBCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2023