Legal Opinion

Blumenfeld v. Union Nat. Bank of Beloit

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided February 6, 1930No. 74PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

COTTERAL, Circuit Judge.

This appeal is brought by S. Blumenfeld to reverse a decree which disallowed his claim of $8,000, as a preference against the assets of the Union National Bank of Beloit, Kan., and awarded him only a recovery of his demand as a general creditor of that bank. We summarize the facts, established at a hearing by the agreement and evidence of the parties:

On January 31, 1921, the Union National Bank of Beloit, Kan., owned and sold to appellant a note and mortgage of Mollie Owen, for $8,000, in consideration of his payment to the hank of that amount by a cheek on another…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Peters v. BainSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
  2. Schuyler v. LittlefieldSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
  3. Empire State Surety Co. v. Carroll CountyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1912
  4. Brennan v. TillinghastCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1913
  5. Macy v. RoedenbeckCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1915

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Merrill v. Abbott (In Re Independent Clearing House Co.)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Utah · 1984
  2. Queenan v. MaysCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1937
  3. Kershaw v. JenkinsCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1934
  4. Kershaw v. KimbleCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1933
  5. Connolly v. LangCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1933

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API