Legal Opinion

Knight v. State

Court of Appeals of Arkansas

Decided June 24, 1998No. CA CR 97-845PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

John Mauzy Pittman, Judge.

The appellant in the case at bar admitted that he raped a five-year-old girl. After he was charged with that offense, he contended that his confession was illegally obtained and moved to suppress it. The trial court denied the motion. Pursuant to Ark. R. Crim. P. 24.3(b), appellant entered a conditional guilty plea and was sentenced to twenty-five years’ imprisonment. He now appeals from the trial court’s denial of his motion to suppress his confession. We affirm.

Rule 24.3(b) presents an exception to the rule prohibiting appeal from a guilty plea, but only for the…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Wofford v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1997
  2. Humphrey v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1997
  3. Freeman v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1975
  4. Hamm v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1988
  5. Hood v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1997

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Williams v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1999
  2. Wilson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2006
  3. Wilkins v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2005
  4. Knight v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1998
  5. Maxfield v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2000

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API