Legal Opinion

Wilkins v. State

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided January 11, 2005No. 03-127PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HILL, Chief Justice.

[¶ 1] On December 4, 2002, appellant, Michael S. Wilkins (Wilkins), entered a conditional plea of nolo contendere 1 to the crime of third degree sexual assault. 2 In addition to the complaint from the victim of the crime, a very important piece of evidence against Wilkins was a confession he made after taking a polygraph test that indicated he was being untruthfal in his answers. The "condition" of his nolo contendere plea was that he reserved the right to appeal the district court's conclusion that his confession was voluntary and, therefore, admissible in evidence at his…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Hannon v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2004
  2. Sanchez v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1979
  3. Simmers v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1997
  4. State v. PetitjeanOhio Court of Appeals · 2000
  5. Garcia v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1989

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Dharminder Vir Sen v. The State of WyomingWyoming Supreme Court · 2013
  2. Counts v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2012
  3. Jamie Stuart Snyder v. The State of WyomingWyoming Supreme Court · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API