Legal Opinion

Lindow v. Mudge

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided September 4, 1929No. Docket No. 17, Calendar No. 33,888PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFellows, J.

Plaintiffs traded property in the city of Detroit with defendants for a farm in Livingston county. They filed a bill to rescind after the property transferred to defendants had been sold to parties who upon this record were good-faith purchasers. After a hearing the case was transferred to the law side, the court finding in the order that defendants were guilty of fraud. The propriety of making this order or of its contents is not questioned. The case was tried to a jury without any change of pleadings and upon the theory that a fraud was perpetrated on plaintiffs, the trial judge thus…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Boston Piano & Music Co. v. Pontiac Clothing Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1917
  2. Tishhouse v. SchoenbergMichigan Supreme Court · 1926
  3. Zadel v. SimonMichigan Supreme Court · 1922
  4. Holmes v. BorowskiMichigan Supreme Court · 1925

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Mesh v. CitrinMichigan Supreme Court · 1941
  2. DeGrave v. EngleMichigan Supreme Court · 1950
  3. Lindow v. MudgeMichigan Supreme Court · 1934

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API