Legal Opinion

Lindow v. Mudge

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided March 6, 1934No. Docket No. 29, Calendar No. 37,053PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtButzel, J.

Herman Lindow and wife, plaintiffs, claiming that they had been induced to exchange their property for a farm through the fraud and misrepresentations of Harry E. Mudge and Christine D. Mudge, his wife, defendants, brought suit on the equity side of the court. The trial court ordered a transfer to the law side and the case was tried before a jury, upon the theory of fraud, without any new pleadings being filed. The judge charged the jury that the only fraud claimed consisted of Mudge’s misrepresentation that he would furnish $2,000 with which,to enable plaintiffs to operate the farm.…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Forsythe v. Washtenaw Circuit JudgeMichigan Supreme Court · 1914
  2. Kirker v. LarsonMichigan Supreme Court · 1931
  3. Lindow v. MudgeMichigan Supreme Court · 1929
  4. McDonell v. Wayne Circuit JudgeMichigan Supreme Court · 1923

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. National Discount Corp. v. O'MellCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1952

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API