Legal Opinion
State v. Copeland
North Dakota Supreme Court
Decided November 28, 1989No. Cr. 890051PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ERICKSTAD, Chief Justice.
John Lee Copeland has appealed from a criminal judgment entered upon conviction of the crime of corruption of a minor, 1 two orders denying his motions for a new trial, and an amended criminal judgment. We affirm.
On July 19, 1988, Copeland was tried before the court without a jury on charges of gross sexual imposition and corruption of a minor. The trial court issued its memorandum opinion on August 25, 1988, finding Copeland guilty of corruption of a minor and not guilty of gross sexual imposition. A criminal judgment dated October 31, 1988, was filed on November 4,…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- State v. MankeNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1982
- United States v. Ray J. Beran and Andrew Kaminski, A/K/A Andrew M. KaminskiCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1977
- United States v. J. Marshall BrownCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1979
- Knoff v. American Crystal Sugar Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1986
- State v. ChyleNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1980
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- City of Fargo v. McLaughlinNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1994
- State v. ClarkNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1997
- Ellis v. StateNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2003
- State v. SimekNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1993
- Dietrich v. N.D. Workers Compensation BureauNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1997
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.