Legal Opinion

Johnston v. Amsted Industries, Inc.

Colorado Court of Appeals

Decided April 9, 1992No. 91CA0230PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Judge DAVIDSON.

In this products liability case, plaintiffs, Christopher and Janice Johnston, appeal from the summary judgment entered in favor of defendants, Amsted Industries, Inc., and South Bend Lathe, Inc. Presenting issues of first impression in Colorado, plaintiffs argue that strict products liability should attach to a corporate successor for the defective product of a predecessor under the “product line doctrine” or “continuity of enterprise” exception to traditional corporate law. We reject these arguments and therefore affirm.

The case was submitted to the trial court on…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Ray v. Alad Corp.California Supreme Court · 1977
  2. Turner v. Bituminous Casualty Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1976
  3. Ramirez v. Amsted Industries, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1981
  4. Hiigel v. General Motors CorporationSupreme Court of Colorado · 1976
  5. Dawejko v. Jorgensen Steel Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1981

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Pearson Ex Rel. Trent v. National Feeding Systems, Inc.Kentucky Supreme Court · 2002
  2. Savage Arms, Inc. v. Western Auto Supply Co.Alaska Supreme Court · 2001
  3. Winsor v. Glasswerks PHX, L.L.C.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2003
  4. Garcia v. Coe Manufacturing Co.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1997
  5. T.H.S. Northstar Associates, Ltd. Partnership v. W.R. Grace & Co.-Conn.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1993

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API