Legal Opinion

Edwards v. State

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided May 17, 2007No. 49S02-0705-CR-202PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBoehm, J.

We hold that the federal constitutional right to self-representation requires that a defendant who is competent to be tried for a crime be permitted to proceed pro se if that is the defendant’s choice.

Facts and Procedural Background

On July 12, 1999, Ahmad Edwards fired three gunshots after being confronted on a downtown Indianapolis street by Ryan Martin, a department store loss prevention officer who had seen Edwards steal a pair of shoes. One of the shots grazed Martin’s back, and one struck a bystander in the ankle. Edwards fled. Special Agent Thomas Flynn of the FBI was in the vicinity…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Johnson v. ZerbstSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. Faretta v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  3. Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  4. Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  5. Dusky v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Indiana v. EdwardsSupreme Court of the United States · 2008
  2. Henley v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2008
  3. State v. ConnorSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2009
  4. Edwards v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2009
  5. In Re Amendments to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.111Supreme Court of Florida · 2009

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API