Edwards v. State
Indiana Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
BOEHM, Justice.
We hold that the record supports a finding by the trial court that the defendant suffered from a severe mental illness to the point where he was not competent to conduct trial proceedings by himself. The denial of the defendant's request to act pro se at trial therefore did not violate either his federal or state constitutional right to self-representation.
Facts and Procedural History
The facts of this case are recited at length in Indiana v. Edwards (Edwards), - U.S. -, 128 S.Ct. 2379, 171 L.Ed.2d 345 (2008), and Edwards v. State, 866 N.E.2d 252 (Ind.2007).
Defendant Ahmad…
2Cases cited42 opinions
- Moran v. BurbineSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Dusky v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
- Pate v. RobinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Drope v. MissouriSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Thompson v. KeohaneSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- Bond v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2010
- Fletcher v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2012
- Anthony Bedolla v. State of IndianaIndiana Supreme Court · 2019
- Santiago Valdez v. State of IndianaIndiana Court of Appeals · 2016
- Susan E. Sturdivant v. State of IndianaIndiana Court of Appeals · 2016
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.