Legal Opinion

In Re Amendments to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.111

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided August 27, 2009No. SC08-2163PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLabarga, J.

This matter is before the Court for consideration sua sponte of amendments to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.111(d) (Waiver of Counsel). We have jurisdiction. See art. V, § 2(a), Fla. Const.

Background

In Indiana v. Edwards, — U.S. -, 128 S.Ct. 2379, 171 L.Ed.2d 345 (2008), the United States Supreme Court held that the Constitution permits a state to limit a defendant’s right to self-representation under Faretta v. California, 422 U.S. 806, 95 S.Ct. 2525, 45 L.Ed.2d 562 (1975), by insisting upon representation by counsel at trial on the ground that, though competent to stand trial, the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Faretta v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  2. Dusky v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
  3. Pate v. RobinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  4. Indiana v. EdwardsSupreme Court of the United States · 2008
  5. Amendment to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.111(d)(2)-(3)Supreme Court of Florida · 1998

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Monte v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2011
  2. Hernandez-Alberto v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2013
  3. Losada v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2018
  4. Loor v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2018
  5. Sylvester Hooks v. State of FloridaDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2017

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API