Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Coyote Lake Ranch, LLC v. City of Lubbock

Texas Supreme Court

Decided May 27, 2016No. 14-0572Published

1ConcurrenceJustice Boyd

“Absent an agreement to the contrary, an oil-and-gas lessee has an implied right to use the land as reasonably necessary to produce and remove the minerals but must exercise that right with due regard for the landowner’s rights.” Ante at 55. This is the common-law “accommodation ' doctrine,” and it is a well-established tenet of our oil-and-gas jurisprudence. See Memman v. XTO Energy, Inc., 407 S.W.3d 244, 249 (Tex.2013); Tarrant Cty. Water Control, & Imp. Diet. No. One v. Haupt, Inc., 854 S.W.2d 909, 911 (Tex.1993); Getty Oil Co. v. Jones, 470 S.W.2d 618, 621 (Tex. 1971). Addressing an issue…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Homer Merriman v. Xto Energy, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 2013
  2. Getty Oil Company v. JonesTexas Supreme Court · 1971
  3. Moser v. United States Steel Corp.Texas Supreme Court · 1984
  4. Tarrant County Water Control & Improvement District Number One v. Haupt, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1993
  5. the City of Lubbock, Texas v. Coyote Lake Ranch, LLC, Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API